BUILDING
THE NATION - POEM ANALYSIS |
By
Christopher H. M. Barlow (Uganda)
Today I did my share
In building the nation.
I drove the permanent secretary
To an important urgent function
In fact to a luncheon at the Vic.
The menu reflected its importance
Cold Bell beer with small talk,
Then fried chicken with niceties
Wine to fill the hollowness of the laughs
Ice-ream to cover the stereotype jokes
Coffee to keep the PS awake on return journey.
I drove the permanent secretary back.
He yawned many times in the back of the car
Then to keep awake, he suddenly asked,
Did you have any lunch friend?
I replied looking straight ahead
And secretly smiling at his belated concern
That I had not, but was sliming!
Upon which he said with a seriousness
That amused more than annoyed me,
Mwananchi, I too had none!
I attended to matters of
state.
Highly delicate diplomatic duties you know,
And friend, it goes against my grain,
Causes me stomach ulcers and wind.
Ah, he continued, yawning again,
The pains we suffer in building the nation!
So the PS had ulcers too!
My ulcers I think are equally painful
Only they are caused by hunger,
No sumptuous lunches!
So two nation builders
Arrived home this evening
With terrible stomach pains
The result of building the nation –
- Different ways.
INTRODUCTION.
Building the nation is a
poem by a Ugandan poet Christopher Henry
Muwanga Barlow that principally explores the lifestyle of African
bourgeoisie who came to power after colonialism and ideally, simply replaced
the colonizers. There is a need for African leaders to create hope for those
they lead but they are caught up in the same evil lifestyle of their colonial
predecessors. The aspects of nation building which were supposed to dominate
public and political policies have been thrust to the periphery of human
thought.
THEMATIC ANALYSIS.
DISILLUSIONMENT
The kind of
disillusionment portrayed in the poem is that which Africans have towards their
leaders who have adopted the very tenets of the colonizers from whom they got
power. Essentially, the idea of nation building turns out to be a very
complicated phenomenon where those who are central to the process have their
efforts wasted by leaders who can implement policies.
The persona shows more
disillusionment by stating that at the meeting “the menu reflected its
importance/ Cold Bell beer with small talks/ then fried chicken with niceties/
wine…/ ice cream …/coffee… (Lines 6-11). This
reflects the triviality of a meeting where serious issues were supposed to be
discussed.
LIES
AND HYPOCRISY.
This has been a vital
tool for most politicians when they want to win more votes from their ignorant
masses. They make heaps of lies on the optimistic crowds but eventually
everything turns out only a nightmare. The PS lies to the driver that he did
not have any meal just as did the driver yet you and I know that he had a very
heavy and sumptuous lunch. He even shows
his hypocrisy more clearly when he asks this question. “Then to keep awake he
suddenly asked/Did you have any lunch friend? A” It is
rather sad to note that he does not ask whether the driver has eaten anything because
he is concerned about his welfare, but it is simply to keep himself awake
through the journey.
CLASSES.
In a broader way the
poem thoroughly depicts two classes in one society. There is middle class and
lower class. Both of them are supposed to mutually benefit from the national
resources. Yet the middle class that is represented by the PS exploits the
lower class that more often than not comprises those who are involved in the
modes of production. For example the driver drives the PS to the place where
there is feasting (eating) while the driver does not take part in the feasting.
The role of both classes is building the nation, but the middle class has just
become the parasites who feed on the national resources at the expense of the
masses. They are not building the nation at all but building their stomachs.
MARGINALIZATION AND EXPLOITATION
Furthermore in the poem,
the two parties represent the two strands of nation builders that are in most
African states. On one side there are those represented by the driver (the
local masses) while on the other hand we have high class being represented by
the PS. The later is very busy misquandering the public funds which can be used
to rebuild the nations. The masses are the hardworking people whose benevolence
is easily taken for granted by those in power. There are those who eat extravagantly
and those who work on empty stomachs. The persona himself comes from the
marginalized class. His disillusionment is caused by lifestyles of African
leaders and informs his fellow countrymen what is actually happening.
AWARENESS
The poem paints a
picture of awareness that those who are oppressed are now aware that those in
power are exploiting them. This is an important step as long as the liberation
of the oppressed is concerned. It is also a significant step if the nation is
to realize sustainable development where the national resources will be
mutually utilized for the benefit of not only the ruling class but the masses
as well.
If we examine the end of
the poem it seems to induce a kind of anger that should lead to vengeance
(revenge). The persona is appealing to the oppressed to rise to the occasion
and deal with the ruling class.
The fact that “two
nation builders/ arrived home this evening/with terrible stomach pain/the
result of building the nation/different ways” is more like an appeal to
emotions where the persona seeks actions from the masses.
In a way, the persona
calls for a reaction towards the ruling class’s hypocritical nation building
where they pretend to have welfare of the masses at heart while in real sense
they just want to capitalize on their efforts.
VULNERABILITY OF HUMANITY.
Nevertheless, the
persona seems to have hopes in some facts that both the African bourgeoisie and
the proletariats have their points of vulnerability. They both suffer in one
way or another because of their own actions and lifestyles. For instance the
driver becomes sick because of lack of food while the PS becomes sick for
eating too much.
So Ps has ulcers too!
My ulcers I think are equally painful
Only they are caused by hunger,
No sumptuous lunches!
MESSAGE
If we wish to do well in nation building we
must as public servants respect everything that belongs to the state; money,
property, working hours etc.
If the high class is not
careful with nation building one day the oppressed may revolt.
RELEVANCE
The poem is relevant in
our country in a number of ways.
·
Today we have a lot of leaders who misuse
the public funds while those who are involved in the means of production live
in dire poverty.
·
Hypocrisy has also become a way of life.
·
Classes, exploitation and marginalization
are also major issues in our society.
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
a.
What is the poem about?
The poem is about the
concept of nation building as taken by African bourgeoisie class who came to
power after colonialism. The poet shows that independence was just the change
in color but the leaders adopted the very tenets of their predecessors.
b.
Who is the persona? How do you know?
The persona is a driver
who represents the low class.
In line 3 he says “I
drove the permanent secretary”
C.
Suggest some literary and poetic devices used in the poem.
i.
Alliteration
Highly delicate
diplomatic duties.
And secretly smiling…
Cold Bell beer
ii.
Barbarism
Mwananchi, I too had none!
iii.
Onomatopoeia
Ah, he continued yawning
again.
This is the sound of
yawning
iv. Satire
To an important urgent
function
In fact to a luncheon at
the Vic.
Lunch is called an
important urgent function, this is very satirical
v. Irony.
The title of the poem ‘Building the Nation” is ironical because the guys in the
poem were not building the nation.
d.
Why did the PS ask the question “Did you have any
lunch friend?”
He asked the question just to keep himself awake throughout the journey and not because he is concerned by the welfare of the driver.
e.
What is the tone of the poem?
The tone is both sad and ironical/satirical
f. The poet says in the last
stanza ‘so two nation builders
arrived home this evening’ were the two people building the nation?
Not really. The poet uses this as a satire to criticize the idea that people always claim to build the nation but they end up building their stomachs.
Post a Comment